Yard Bot Lab
Robot mowers head-to-head

Segway Navimow i110N vs Ecovacs GOAT O1000 RTK

Both models on one scale, every figure traced to its manufacturer datasheet. Bar length means the same thing here as on every other page of the site.

Navimow i110N vs GOAT O1000 RTK, to scale
  • Navimow i110N
  • GOAT O1000 RTK
Work areamore is better
10,890sq ft
8,600sq ft
  • Navimow i110N: 0.25 acre (recommended mowing area as published)
  • GOAT O1000 RTK: Published as mows up to 8,600 sq ft (1/4 acre) on the US product page. This is a maximum coverage rating for the model, not area covered per charge.
Max slopemore is better
30%
45%
  • Navimow i110N: Published as 30% (17 degrees) maximum slope ability; 10% (6 degrees) maximum slope at boundary
  • GOAT O1000 RTK: Published as 45% (24 degrees) maximum slope for work area. A separate lower limit of 17% applies along virtual boundaries per the US spec table.
Cutting widthmore is better
7.1in
8.66in
Runtimemore is better
120min
65min
  • Navimow i110N: Published as Full Charge Mowing Time (120 min for the i110).
  • GOAT O1000 RTK: Published as About 65 minutes continuous mowing, conditions not specified.
Noiseless is better
58dB
57dB
  • Navimow i110N: Published as 58 dB(A).
Warrantymore is better
3yr
1yr

Segway Navimow i110N

$1,099as of 2026-07-04

Wire-free RTK-and-vision navigation sized for a quarter-acre lawn, at the lowest price of the mowers we track. A fit for small suburban yards that don't want a perimeter wire.

Best for small suburban lawns without a perimeter wire.

Full Navimow i110N review

Ecovacs GOAT O1000 RTK

$999.99as of 2026-07-05

A wire-free robot mower for yards up to a quarter acre, combining LiDAR-enhanced RTK navigation with camera-based obstacle avoidance and edge-to-edge cutting, at a comparatively low published noise level of 57 dBA. Its 8.66 in cutting width and roughly 65 minute runtime suit small to mid-size lawns rather than large properties.

Best for Yards up to 1/4 acre with complex layouts, narrow passages, or pets.

Full GOAT O1000 RTK review

Sources